Specification overview¶
The full normative text is SPEC.md (v0.15). WCM is four layers plus a transparency log. The machine-readable form of the manifest, and the vectors an implementation is checked against, are on the schema and conformance page.
Layer 1 - the manifest¶
A builder issues a signed manifest describing exactly which weights are released
and under what terms: weights_hash, release terms, release policy (assurance
tier, required platforms and serving image, trusted-time source, memory
fingerprint challenge), and custody. It is signed jointly by the builder and
the custodian - never by the customer alone - with an optional sovereign quorum.
Layer 2 - attestation-gated key release¶
The key broker (KBS) issues a single-use nonce; the enclave returns composite evidence (a CPU CVM quote and a separate GPU report, both bound to the nonce); the KBS releases the key only if every check passes (platform, assurance tier, serving-image status with prefer-current, GPU measurement and CPU↔GPU binding, memory fingerprint in the hostile-owner posture, revocation freshness).
Layer 3 - runtime custody (wipe-on-lapse)¶
The enclave holds the key only for the attestation cadence window and zeroizes it
if it does not re-attest in time - the key is gone, not suspended. This bounds
worst-case exposure to one cadence window against an operator who cannot forge
attestation, subject to a trusted clock (trusted_time_source).
Layer 4 - derivative lineage¶
A fine-tune produces a new weights_hash with derived_from pointing at its
parent and a rights_holder recording the IP split, forming a chain of custody
back to the root.
Transparency (§3.7)¶
An append-only Merkle log (RFC 9162) with signed tree heads makes equivocation and suppressed revocations detectable.
Guarantee scope (§3.6) - read this¶
WCM does not claim silicon-enforced custody against a bare-metal owner with no physical hardening. That configuration is out of scope, deliberately. See Limitations.